After communicating with John Petroski via e-mail over the past few days, I wish I could tell you the following happened:
1) He replied gracefully to each e-mail sent to him from the readers of this blog, especially to the survivors of sexual assault who opened up to him.
2) He e-mailed to tell us that he finished reading Voices of Courage: Inspiration from Survivors of Sexual Assault and then shared the insight he gained from the book. **To help raise his awareness, we sent him the e-book during the first evening of e-mail communications with him.
Unfortunately, neither of those results occurred. In fact, John Petroski did not respond to any of the e-mails forwarded to him by readers of this blog. When we e-mailed him to see if he was going to respond, he told us he didn't know what to say. We recommended he thank each person for their words. Instead, he simply hasn't replied -- until this morning. This morning, we received the following e-mail exchange from John Petroski
First e-mail from John Petroski (he is referring to an e-mail forwarded to him from a reader of this blog):
"You know what? There is absolutely nothing nice I can say about people who honestly feel my article 'glorif[ied] rape.' So I won't. CNN already pretty much laid it out for me, anyway."
Mike Domitrz's response:
John:
Then I will share your response on the blog. Since you have not responded to any of the e-mails yet, I will also stop forwarding these e-mails to you.
John Petroski's next e-mail response:
Please keep forwarding them. I made a promise to read them all and I will. I don't believe I promised to reply to every last one, however.
But you know, while I am sorry about hurting people, I can't be sorry about people not getting that I wasn't serious, because I made the article so over the top ridiculous that everyone should be able to tell that I don't seriously condone rape, and if they can't tell that, that's not my fault.
I'm willing to be hear and listen to people who realize I was not seriously condoning rape and who are still hurt regardless.
I don't think I'm being unreasonable here.
Thanks,
John Petroski
Mike Domitrz's next response:
John:
On my blog, I will let your e-mails speak for themselves. I will not summarize to take the risk of misquoting you. I will share your exact words.
I do think you are being unreasonable. If soooo many people read YOUR words and did not realize you were not being serious, than YOUR WORDS were poorly written by you. Accountability means you look in the mirror and see the results of your choices (both the intended results and the unintended results). You seem to be saying, "I can't control how people react to my words." Yes, you can have great impact on your words. How? By the words you choose.